After reading both, Booker T. Washington's "Atlanta Compromise" speech and W.E.B. DuBois' "Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others" essay, I was able to slightly agree with Dubois more than Washington.The main problem I had with Washington's speech was the it was too submissive. He made it seem like the only way for black people to make any social, economic, and/or political gains was to willingly start from the bottom. A quote from his speech that I think best shows this is "The wisest among my race understand that the agitation of questions of social equality is the extremest folly, and that progress in the enjoyment of all the privileges that will come to us must be the result of severe and constant struggle rather than of artificial forcing." I cannot agree with this just because I do not believe that you must suffer in order to prosper at all. I do believe it is certainly possible to struggle and work hard to bring yourself to a prosperous life, and in most cases this the most self-fulfilling, but I do not believe that an entire race should have to settle for this lifestyle. And this is where I think that DuBois and I would agree. Washington makes it seem like it is just best to agree and accept that black people are inferior and need to prove themselves to be equal. In Dubois's essay he states,"In the history of nearly all other races and peoples the doctrine preached at such crises has been that manly self-respect is worth more than lands and houses, and that a people who voluntarily surrender such respect, or cease striving for it, are not worth civilizing." Therefore, being submissive or "voluntarily surrendering such respect" is probably not the best solution.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How We Get Free

How We Get Free  edited by Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor discusses the Combahee River Collective and its initiative in aiding the identity of Black feminism. The intersectionality of this movement quantified the many areas of a 'melting pot' aspect. This idea is explained in asserting "Black women could not quantify their oppression only in terms of sexism or racism, or of homophobia experienced by Black lesbians. They were not ever a single category, but it was the merging or enmeshment of those identities that compounded how Back women experienced oppression."(4). Black feminists had to face several factors of oppression, with race, gender, class, and identity. In thinking about the feminist movement from a surface level perspective, many people think that these women are just facing oppression and trying to overcome it due to their gender. But we need to understand the way that they are continually marginalized at the bottom, factoring race, community, gender, and sexual...
Read more

Freedom Riders 3/26

As I watched the “Freedom Riders” documentary, the more disgusted I become at that racial injustices in American history. At the beginning of the documentary, there is a small montage of bigots giving poor excuses as to why the South should remain segregated. However, there was one quote that stuck out that stated, “You can not change a way of life overnight. The more they try to force us into doing something, the worse the reaction is going to be.” Racism should not be a way of life anyone wants to live through or put onto someone else. The Freedom Riders and many nonviolent protesters weren’t physically imposing on others, so why was the reaction of segregationists to worsening as “they try to force” them into a realistic way of life? Watching the documentary and listening to how the Riders were willing to be martyrs for the Movement as they were physically attacked, their property was destroyed via molotov and mentally drained daily makes me appreciate activism a great deal more, ...
Read more
After reading the rest of Kwame Ture and Charles V. Hamilton's Black Power and then reflecting about what we talked about in class on Tuesday, I still cannot put my finger on an exact definition of "black power." I do believe, though, that "black power" cannot be achieved without a change in the political structure of America. When reading the fourth chapter of this book, the idea that people in power control the law is brought up. I, almost, one hundred percent agree with this. The quote from the book that stood out to me was "Law is the agent of those in political power; it is the product of those powerful enough to define right and wrong and to have that definition legitimized by "law." This is not to say that "might makes right," but it is to say that Might makes Law." This quote shows how political leaders shape the law. Those in power get to make the laws, whether they are just or not. I still believe this today. I believe...
Read more